 |





 |
wiscon
cmeckhardt | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I had a thought for how to make a particular kind of panel run more smoothly.
I have attended a lot of panels, most of which I really enjoyed, on the general topic of "how come we never see $noun_phrase in SFF?" ("fat protagonists", "protagonists who are mothers", "old protagonists", hard SF written by women" etc.) A common way for these panels to fail is that for any noun phrase, there are a handful of obscure books/shows/movies that really do address that issue and a couple dozen more that sort of skirt it, and the panel gets bogged down with people listing off these books and media.
Since we are all at the panel because we're interested in the topic, this is pretty useful, because presumably we would like to experience these rare outliers that are addressing the topic. But it takes a long time for people to list these off (and to pause the action while everyone who wants to writes them down), and then we run out of time to discuss the phenomenon of why this issue isn't addressed more often, which is the ostensible panel topic.
So I wanted to suggest that the rooms have poster paper on an easel with a marker, and at any time during a panel that an audience member (or a panel member!) thinks of something they would recommend that's germane to the topic, they can just stand up an write it on the paper and sit down again. The conversation doesn't have to get interrupted, other people in the room can take notes or not as they fit, people who blog the panel can take down the list for later republishing, etc. If you're worried it won't be obvious why you're making the recommendation, you could put a few keywords in parens after it. (For example, "all Le Guin (gender issues)" or "Xenogenesis saga, Octavia Butler (book cover whitewashing)".)
This could really be generalized to lots of other panels too- this was just the panel style that I noticed was most derailed by recommendations.
Thoughts?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|
 |
|
 |